Tony Smith's Home Page

The Large Glass by Marcel Duchamp (1887-1968):


CALLING ALL DUCHAMPIANS :

Dew Harrison is proposing a project entitled "Deconstructing Duchamp" which requires 25 participants to lateralise the 'Large Glass' by reconfiguring "The bride stripped bare by her bachelors, even" from a 2D field into 25 interlinked elements across the Network field. Each element of the 'Glass' e.g. The chocolate grinder, 9 malic moulds etc., will be a web-site for gathering ideas, theories, quotes, diagrams, illustrations, sounds, images.........relating to that element. Where this information touches, involves or points the way to another 'Glass' element a direct link is made. The project needs each of the 25 participants to be responsible for one element/web-site's design, data input, linkage and update. If you are interested in digitising Duchamp and taking on a web-site please email Dew Harrison, at : dharriso @ gwent.ac.uk This should make an exciting project transposing the 'Large Glass' into a global web of 25 interlinked web-sites, possibly a new interpretation in itself, certainly an explicit display of Duchamp's associated thoughts and ideas held within this piece of work and hopefully an illustration of the poetical and philosophical magic of his thought. BIOGRAPHY OF DEW HARRISON: Dew Harrison is a doctoral research student at CAIIA where his current research involves the meeting of hypermedia, concept-based art and the cognitive models of associative thought which underlie both. The work processes under the title "Hypermedia Systems: the interpretation and creation of concept-based art" and is concerned with creating coherent linkage systems of multi-media thoughts and ideas, fully interactive, collaborative and easily accessed by any user. He is about to undertake a critical analysis of the conceptual structure implicit in Marcel Duchamp's "Large Glass", the Case-Study for this inquiry. It is intended to transpose this art work, as a semantic network system, into hypermedia to examine and determine the underlying conceptual architecture. Dew Harrison CAIIA - Centre for Advanced Inquiry in the Interactive Arts University of Wales College Newport Caerleon Campus PO Box 179 Newport, Gwent, Wales NP6 1YG

DUCHAMP QUOTES [Some are paraphrased.]:


I believe that the artist doesn't know what he does. I attach even more importance to the spectator than to the artist.

When artist and spectator play a game of chess it is like designing something or constructing a mechanism of some kind. The competitive side of it has no importance.


REPLY TO QUESTION - WHAT SATISFIES YOU MOST?

Basically, that I've never worked for a living.


Only the "Large Glass" interested me, ... I wanted to be free of any material obligation, so I began a career as a librarian, which was a sort of excuse for not being obliged to show up socially. ... I knew very well that I would never be able to pass the examination at the school, but I went there as a sort of grip on an intellectual position. At the same time, I was doing my calculations for the "Large Glass".

The ideas in the Large Glass are more important than the actual realization.

The "Large Glass" constitutes a rehabilitation of perspective. For me, it's a mathematical, scientific perspective, based on calculations and on dimensions.

Everything was becoming conceptual, that is, it depended on things other than the retina.

What we were interested in at the time was the fourth dimension. Simply, I thought of the idea of a projection, of an invisible fourth dimension, something you couldn't see with your eyes.

"The Bride" in the "Large Glass" was based on this, as if it were the projection of a four-dimensional object. I called "The Bride" a "delay in glass."

A tactile sensation which envelopes every side of an object approaches a tactile sensation of four dimensions. Consequently the act of love as tactile sublimation could be felt as a physical interpretation of the 4th dimension.


The use of glass has no significance other than to protect my colors, giving maximum effectiveness to the rigidity of perspective. It also took away any idea of "the hand" of materials.

The Large Glass is a lot better with the breaks, a hundred times better. It's the destiny of things.


For me the number three is important: one is unity, two is double, duality, and three is the rest.

My "Three Standard Stoppages" is produced by three separate experiments, and the form of each one is slightly different.

At first I thought of eight Malic Moulds and I thought, that's not a multiple of three. It didn't go with my idea of three. I added one, which made nine.

The mold side is invisible. I always avoided doing something tangible, but with a mold it doesn't matter, because it's the inside I didn't want to show.


The image above is a key to The Large Glass, the beginnings of which go back to Duchamp's visit to Munich in July and August of 1912.

Duchamp's apartment was near the university of Sommerfeld, who was later advisor to Heisenberg and Stueckelberg. I do not know whether Duchamp and Sommerfeld ever met.

Here is a color gif (185k) of The Large Glass.


My interpretation of The Large Glass, also called La Mariee Mise A Nu Par Ses Celibataires, Meme:

The glass is as transparent as the transparent Clear Light, between the Dark Imminence and the colorful 4-phase Bardo of Luminous Dharmata.

The circular water wheel has 8 paddles. The 8 paddles are the octonions, and the circle represents their multiplication.


The octonion water wheel is within a 3-dimensional cube with runners. The runners indicate that the 3-dimensional cube should move, and such motion should define a 4-dimensional hypercube. Choosing the black squares of a chessboard tiling of 4-dimensional space by hypercubes gives a 24-cell tiling of 4-dimensional space. A 24-cell is essentially a hypercube with a hyper-pyramid added to each of its 8 faces. Duchamp's Small Glass, To Be Looked at (from the other side of the Glass) with One Eye, Close to, for Almost an Hour shows a hyper-pyramid to be placed on each face of the hyper-cube formed by the 3-dimensional cube with runners in The Large Glass.


There were originally to be 8 bachelors, each with 3 capillary stoppages, for a total of 24 sources of particles.

Duchamp changed his mind, and adding a 9th bachelor and connecting the 9 bachelors to 9 stoppages (one each).

The 8 original bachelors are (first generation) fermion particles (red dots) and antiparticles (green dots). The 9th bachelor is the scalar particle (purple dot). The stoppages are each 1 meter, so that everything arrives in phase.


The stoppages lead to 8-dimensional spacetime, represented by 7 spacelike lightcones (blue dots). The 8th dimension, time, is not represented by a lightcone, but has a blue dot.

For an octonionic coordinate basis (1,i,j,k,e,ie,je,ke), the lightcones have the following 2-dimensional spaces:

(i,j), (j,k), (k,i), (e,(ie+je+ke)), (ie,je), (je,ke), (ke,ie)

Duchamp's representation of the lightcones has two additional interpretations:

First, the lightcones are tilted with respect to each other. The tilting could be caused by action of a non-zero gravitational WEYL curvature tensor that could be produced by quantum fluctuations after a conformally flat big bang. Duchamp represents the tilting as a semicircle which, if continued to a full circle, would result in a closed timelike loop. Closed timelike loops, non-computable operations, and consciousness are discussed by Roger Penrose in his book Shadows of the Mind (Oxford (1994)).

Second, the semicircle of lightcones corresponds to a timelike axis in spacetime that is the RP1 of the 8-dimensional spacetime RP1xS7 and also the RP1 of the reduced 4-dimensional spacetime RP1xS3.


The spacetime of the lightcones and the fermions and scalar are connected to the chocolate grinder.

The chocolate grinder receives octonionic structure from the water wheel.

Mitchell Whitelaw has a musical composition (in Macintosh Finale format) based on the chocolate grinder on his home page.

The chassis of the chocolate grinder represents the 28 infinitesimal generator gauge bosons of the adjoint representation of Spin(8).

The 3 rollers of the chocolate grinder represent the 8-dimensional spacetime (blue dot), the 8 (first generation) fermion particles (red dot), and the 8 (first generation) fermion antiparticles (green dot).

The necktie of the chocolate grinder represents the scalar particle.

Together, the chassis and 3 rollers of the chocolate grinder form the Dynkin diagram of Spin(8):


The chocolate grinder and the hypercube are connected to a pair of scissors, which cut off 4 of the 8 dimensions of spacetime, leaving a quaternionic 4-dimensional spacetime with basis (1,i,j,k) and lightcones:

(i,j), (j,k), (k,i)


Duchamp's 4 Oct 54 statement:

"For me there is something other than yes, no, and indifferent - it is for example the absence of investigations of this kind."

showed his understanding of the fundamental basis of quantum theory, with "indifferent" being his term for "superposition", and "investigations" being his term for "experimental measurements".

A path integral sum over histories quantum theory is given by the butterfly pump, which pumps out amplitudes for all possible paths, the sum of which is represented by a Cornu spiral (see Funktionentafeln, Jahnke and Emde, 4th Ed. Dover (1945)) sum of amplitudes:

The Cornu spiral is the projection on the (S,C) plane in (S,C,u) space of the Fresnel integral curve in (S,C,u) space. The 3-dimensional Fresnel integral curve resembles Duchamp's Rotary Glass Plates (1920).


The 3 oculist witnesses correspond to the Lie algebra E6.

The top oculist witness has 12 radial groups of rays (each of which is a made up of 3 rays). The 12 rays lead to 12 of the root vectors of E6.

Further, the 12 rays correspond to the 12 lines of the Schlafli double-six:

All 36 of the rays correspond to the fact that there are 36 double-sixes in the 27 lines on a general cubic surface:

The symmetry group of the 27 line configuration is the same as the symmetry group of the 6-dimensional polytope 2_21 with 27 vertices and 27+72 faces, that is, the Weyl group of E6 of order 72x6! = 51,840 (see Coxeter, Math. Z. 200 (1988) 3-45).

The middle oculist witness has 6 circles. They correspond to the 6-torus, the maximal torus of the E6 Cartan subalgebra.

The bottom oculist witness has 60 radial rays. Together with the 12 groups of rays of the top oculist witness, they correspond to the 72 root vectors of E6.

15 of the 60 correspond to the 15 bivectors of Spin(6).

The other 45 of the 60 correspond to the infinitesimal generators of the Spin(10) subalgebra of E6.

All 6+6+15+45=72 can be represented by the 27 lines and 45 points of the configuration dual to the 27-line 135-point configuration of lines on a cubic surface.

The Weyl group of E6 is the invariance group of the Gem of the Modular Universe by Bruce Hunt.

He has also written a nice paper on Hyperbolic Planes.


The magnifying lens corresponds to the increase in scale from the fundamental Planck-length lattice to the larger scales that we can observe by experiment today.


The region of the boxing match corresponds to the reduction of the original Spin(8) gauge group that existed prior to dimensional reduction of spacetime to gravity and SU(2)xSU(3)xU(1) that we now observe.


The region of the Wilson-Lincoln effect corresponds to the Higgs mechanism that gives mass to the SU(2) weak bosons and to the Dirac fermions, with one massive residual Higgs scalar.


In the region of gravity:

the weight (representing a single point) corresponds to the single octonion O representing first generation fermions;

the rod (representing its 2 end-points) corresponds to the octonion pair OxO representing second generation fermions; and

the trivet (representing its 3 corners) corresponds to the octonion triple OxOxO representing third generation fermions.


The 8 shots in the 4-dimensional spacetime with gravity represent the 8 types of fermion particles (red dots) or antiparticles (green dots).

The 9th shot, in the Milky Way, represents the Higgs scalar.

The randomness of the shots is due to quantum fluctuations.


The Milky Way separates the region of the bachelors from the region of the bride, just as in the Chinese legend of the Seamstress (Vega) and the Cowboy (Altair).


The 3 pistons in the Milky Way represent the 3 forces of the standard model: the SU(2) weak force; the SU(3) color force; and U(1) electromagnetism.


The bride represents the spirit world of massless unconfined gauge bosons:

photons (of the light of the filaments in the upper left part of the bride); and

gravitons (of the gravity related to the pendulum-like suspension from the mortice joint of the center right part of the bride).

Those parts of the bride are interconnected and interact to influence the wasp, which extends (through its weathervane, which represents a light-like world-tube) to the horizon to influence the material world of the bachelors.

Duchamp's 4 Oct 54 statement:

"... the Bride or the Pendu femelle is a 'projection' comparable to the projection of an 'imaginary entity' in 4 dimensions in our world of 3 dimensions (and even in the case of flat glass to a reprojection of these three dimensions on a surface of 2 dimensions)."

shows that Duchamp thought of the Bride in The Large Glass as a being made of photons or gravitons, i.e., made up of 4-dimensional lightlike worldlines.


If The Large Glass were to be combined with its mirror-image, then the result would be this (348k).


After 1923, Duchamp quit working on The Large Glass and begain to play chess intensively. He did not care about competition, but played chess to design or construct something beautiful. The 64 squares of the chessboard can be used to represent:

the 8x8 matrix representation of the Spin(8) Lie algebra;

each of the two half-spinor parts of the even subalgebra of the Spin(8) Clifford algebra; and

the 64-dimensional Clifford algebra of Spin(6) = SU(4).

In the Paris exhibition Le Surrrealisme en 1947 , Duchamp displayed

Le Rayon Vert - a view through a ship's porthole of the green flash of the setting sun. Le Rayon Vert may have been based on Jules Verne's 1882 novel Le Rayon-Vert. Verne's novel was updated in Eric Rohmer's 1986 movie Rayon Vert, which for reasons difficult for me to comprehend was retitled in English as Summer. I have wondered whether Luu Dongbin was looking at an Eastern sunrise version of Le Rayon Vert during a mountain-top meditation.

Duchamp's Le Rayon Vert disappeared after the 1947 exhibition closed, and Duchamp did not reproduce it.

Duchamp worked in secret from 1946 to 1966 on Etant Donnes.

Etant Donnes must be viewed through a peep-hole in the foreground door. 
The view is further directed by a hole in the midground brick wall. 
The background contains a landscape and waterfall. 
Between the midground and background is a diorama, 
perhaps related to the Heilige Kuemmernis that Duchamp may 
have encountered in his visit to Munich in 1912, and 
the story of a daughter of a mythical king. 

1960s: Etant Donnes restricts the view of the spectator in two planes: the foreground hole in the door and the midground hole in the brick wall.

1940s: Le Rayon Vert restricts the view of the spectator in one plane - of a ship's porthole through which the spectator sees the green flash of the setting sun.

1920s: The Large Glass does not restrict the view of the spectator at all - the spectator can look through it from any side or angle.

The Large Glass is at Philadelphia Museum of Art. Since Le Rayon Vert has disappeared, it is not there.

Etant Donnes was not shown until after Duchamp's death in 1968. It is now in the Philadelphia Museum of Art. If you would like to see jpg images of the diorama and background, and of the foreground door, in Etant Donnes, you can go to the texas.net Museum of Art and go to its ftp site, then go to Duchamp, and go to the images. It is a good art site with interesting features and many images.


Sources and References:

Marcel Duchamp, Moure, Rizzoli (1988);

The Definitively Unfinished Marcel Duchamp, de Duve (ed), MIT Press (1991);

Marcel Duchamp, Hulten (ed), MIT Press (1993); and

Dialogues with Marcel Duchamp, 1966 interview with Pierre Cabanne, Plenum (Da Capo) (1971, 1987) (During the interview, even when asked about giving up art, Duchamp does not mention The Waterfall (1946-1966).)


Tony Smith's Home Page

...

...